Fifteen years ago I interviewed for entrance to a Master’s of Urban and Regional Planning program, and as these type of interviews often go I was asked to tell a bit about myself and why I wanted to become an urban planner. Not knowing the rules of propriety on these type of things I began to explain to them that I was a Christian, that I had been heavily impacted by Augustine’s work City of God and because of this believed that as a Christian I wanted to work to make the city a great place for all people to live, whatever their faith may be. My host looked back across the table from me and simply responded, “oh… I’m an atheist.” They accepted me for admission and gave me a scholarship and I was off to transform culture.
I started my life in a rural Pentecostal church led by some Jesus Freaks that had gotten into James Dobson. My upbringing was full of my family trying to making sure that we did not do that which the culture did - we were against culture. The TV show “Who’s the Boss” was off-limits because Tony and Angela lived together, even if he was her housekeeper and they were only friends. It had the appearance of evil and that was enough. He-Man and She-Ra were out because they both clearly were involved with the occult - as were the Care Bears. Mr. Rogers should be watched only in moderation, for of course he was really only about being a nice person (aka works righteousness), and he was a Presbyterian which made us additionally suspicious.
I wound up going to a Presbyterian (of all places) college ministry when I arrived at University of Washington. While there I had a radical change of heart about how to approach the world. I had two major voices: one was from my pastor and the other was my professors in my Comparative Religion major at a public university. My pastor, Mike Gaffney, was always going to Genesis 12 to talk about how we were supposed to be a blessing to culture, yet at first I couldn’t understand how that worked if we were always making sure to tell people that we don’t celebrate Halloween because it’s “the devil’s day.” As my professors started pointing me to read historical theology I realized that not only was my previous dispensational premillenial theology a chronologically new view, but it was a view that was not prone to transform culture as it was instead more oriented to shy away from culture. Richard Niebuhr describes the ethics of the “Christ against culture” group as being predominated by the ethic of holiness - or separatedness for the Gospel (Niebuhr, Christ and Culture, xliv). This makes sense if we are to understand ourselves as the new Israel because we are replacing them, yet biblically the model doesn’t seem to be a perfect fit as we are instead admonished to be “in the world, but not of it.” (John 17:15-18).
As I started looking more into the idea that as Christians we should be salt, I realized that this metaphor might mean that we are not simply salty as an act of preservation to stem rot or decay, but perhaps instead we should be salt in the world to add flavor (Matthew 5:13). This overarching narrative that culture is hopelessly rotting simply no longer held the same sway to me biblically. Instead I started to read and listen to leaders from today and the past that were culture changers. People like Jonathan Edwards and Samuel Hopkins, people like Tim Keller, but that is just the beginning. During my studies in urban planning I was able to write great papers on Augustine as well as Calvin’s Geneva. This view that we are not so much establishing a new society, but instead transforming society does seem to be a departure from Israel’s model, and I believe it is. This is one of the areas in which we see that Genesis 12 is simply setting the stage for God’s long term plan for His people of blessing. It is not a blessing from the outside, but a blessing from within.
This idea that we are to transform culture might reach its culmination in Paul’s interaction at the Areopagus in Acts 17. In Acts 17 we see Paul do something that should shock us as we read from a straight Hebraic perspective in which Paul is willing to tell the Greeks that they have some measure of truth in their own underlying worldview - but it was incomplete and used to point to the greater truth of the God that has made Himself fully known in Jesus Christ.
If I didn’t think that we should transform culture I would be stuck. I am far too rigid in my understanding of our call toward holiness to essentially assimilate the church to culture, yet I have a hard time reconciling the ministry of Jesus with the ethic of Christ against Culture as Jesus seems to consistently step into situations that are more transformative than combative. While the being “against culture” makes sense in its continued emphasis to holiness, looking at the miracles of Jesus we see the compassion of Christ at times trumping ritual cleanliness laws. He touched a woman that had been bleeding for 12 years in Luke 8, He talks with a promiscuous Samaritan woman at a well and she even tries to tell Him that He probably shouldn’t do this in John 4.
As I read through Scripture I see again and again that God is transforming the culture. He has been doing this from the beginning by taking cultural idols in Genesis and crushing them - he took on primogeniture by elevating Abel over Cain, Jacob over Esau, Joseph over his brothers. He took on polygamy by showing how poorly it turns out for all parties involved, from Hagar and Sarah to the sister-wives Leah and Rachel. God breaks down the cultural expectation of slavery by elevating Hagar - and these three examples of God transforming culture by speaking into it occur only in the first book of the Bible. The list could go on and on.
I'd love to hear your thoughts so feel free to add something to the comments below or come and talk to me at church about this some Sunday. - Asher
A few weeks ago, my son told me, “I love you more than God.” While this was touching, it also made me think about my heart toward my Father in Heaven. When I first committed my life to him, I wanted all my thoughts, words, and behaviors to be dedicated to him. But that was almost two decades ago. I often neglect to love him as I committed to love him in my spiritual infancy. Edson’s love for me reminds me how I’m meant to love God. I am meant to put all my trust in him, ask him about everything, come to him when I’m in need, and come to him just to spend time with him. He loves all of me, and he knows what I need. He is so wonderful to spend time with, and when I love God like Edson loves me, I’m most at peace.
And as Edson grows and sees more of my shadow, the sin that is invisible to him now, it is my prayer that he redirects his passionate and faithful love toward the father who loves him in ways I cannot. I read something once about the time in a father’s life when he loses his position as a God-like figure in his kids’ eyes. They start to see him as the imperfect human he is, with light but also with darkness. Losing that kind of intense love can feel traumatic. Fathers often reflect on this season as one they have to cope with. Yet if my children don’t lose the ability to love unrestrainedly, but rather send that love to a worthy recipient, then I will rejoice.
So this is my call for this season: to let go of my goals for my life, let go of my anxieties, to rest in him. I think that if I can love God in similar ways Edson loves me, my soul will be transformed and I will bear more fruit. And as my children begin to see me for the man I really am, a pretty good dad who also harms others and often thinks of himself first, I hope to not try to resist the natural change in our relationship, but rather help them see where they can direct their admirational, unconditional, and wholly trusting love. The deserving recipient is God; he will not disappoint.
If you've been around Communitas a while, you know that this community has a history of befriending and serving refugees. Several people regularly volunteer with English Club, a few families in our church have been cultural companions for families who were recently resettled in Spokane, and last summer several people from Communitas hosted a weekly potluck at Polly Judd park for refugee kids and their parents.
A few weeks ago, I got to represent Communitas when World Relief gathered local church leaders together to continue conversations about how local churches can best support refugee families in Spokane. It was a great event where we got an update about the current state of refugee resettlement in our nation and in Spokane specifically, and where we learned a bit more how to best befriend and support the families who are being resettled right here in our own neighborhoods. We also brainstormed as churches about different ways church communities can continue to welcome refugee families. This was clear: local churches are invaluable partners in order to successfully resettle refugees in Spokane.
Over and over, throughout the old and new testaments, God calls His people to welcome the foreigners, for the Israelites were once foreigners in a foreign land and when they finally arrive in what becomes their own land, the Israelites are not to forget what it was like to be a foreigner. They are to care for and incorporate the foreigners among them. I don't know about you, but at times I feel hesitant about reaching out to refugees here. I worry about saying the wrong thing, or having nothing to say, or feeling guilty that I have so much more than they do. But in the moments where I have gotten to meet and chat with refugees, I nearly always walk away feeling incredibly grateful for the conversation and somehow closer to Jesus and to God's people in general.
So here are a few ways you can welcome and serve refugees this summer:
1. Communitas will again host weekly potlucks for refugee families at Polly Judd park. They will be every Wednesday evening, starting July 11th for 6-8 weeks. Mia will have more info for us as we get closer to that time.
2. World Relief has several families who are begging to be connected with a cultural companion which entails befriending a refugee family, helping with adapt to American culture and assisting with some basic language skills. If you're interested, talk with me, Sarah Smith or contact World Relief directly.
Summer is almost here, which means we will be taking a little hiatus from our curriculum Adventures with God. These last nine months, our amazing Sunday School teachers have been diving into this curriculum that “focuses on our relationship with God through the Word of God and explores the entire scope of God’s Story.” We are so grateful for their dedication and support of all of the Communitas kiddos.
Since taking this position as Children’s Ministry Director, I’ve been able to observe the classes as well as teach. The dialogue the teachers and students have about our Savior is pretty uplifting. I was giving a lesson about Naaman and while reading his story to the children, the children had so many questions about why Naaman was so bad? Why did Naaman have “yucky spots" all over him? Why did the little girl who was his slave help him? Why did God heal him? Through the lesson they came to understand that forgiveness is healing to our souls and God is the one that provides that healing.
We also have started a Sunday School class for 5th grade and up. They meet two Sundays per month and the other Sundays, they’re either in service or helping in the other kids classes. We're so excited to see how God has continued to shape both the children, older kids and the teachers through these classes and we look forward to a great summer together.
So a few weeks back Austin helped lead us in a new worship song that we hadn't done before. It had a line in it about how God has a "reckless love" for us. Not sure if you remember that or not. He had asked me beforehand about it and mentioned that there were some folks online that don't like that lyric and he explained a bit more about this issue. Okay so I like the song, can I tell you why?
To start let me tell you why I agree with the folks who don't think that we should describe God's love for us as "reckless." They would say that God does not do anything recklessly. He doesn't do anything without proper concern and in order. I totally agree. I think though that they miss the point here and here's why: when we say that God loves us recklessly we are doing that because we say that he is lavishing incredible love on us in a way that almost seems reckless. It can seem reckless, or even foolish, to those that don't know about the love of God because what is amazing about God's love is that he gives it to those even when he knows that they won't respond in like fashion. I see why you could call that reckless.
It reminds me a tiny bit of a book that Tim Keller wrote several years back called, "Prodigal God." The term prodigal normally connotes ideas of somebody who was gone for a long time but now they are back. But originally that was not the definition. The original definition of prodigal is lavish spender, and at times a wasteful spender. So the guy in Luke 15 is called a prodigal originally because he was a lavish spender. He spent all that he had and then had to come home. So you get used to calling him the prodigal son and you know what happens? You forget why he's called prodigal and you just assume it's because he was gone for a long time. Ok - enough about the drift of definitions. Here's why I bring up the book, "Prodigal God." In it, TK uses a word that could reflect negatively on God if you didn't understand the whole meaning of what he is trying to communicate and I think that it's the same thing happening with this worship song talking about God's reckless love.